MACRAMÉ Project Management, Communication and Dissemination – Satisfaction Survey

MACRAMÉ Project Management, Communication and Dissemination - Satisfaction Survey

This anonymous survey aims to assess satisfaction with project management and internal communication, as well as the external communication and dissemination in the MACRAMÉ Project. Your feedback will help us improve processes for future projects. The survey takes approximately 7–10 minutes.

Project Management and Internal Communication

I am satisfied with the overall management of the project

Selected Value: 0

0= absolutely unsatisfied - 5= super happy

Planning, monitoring, and support

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Roles and responsibilities were clearly defined.	Strongly AgreeRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Strongly Agree	AgreeRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Agree	NeutralRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Neutral	DisagreeRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Strongly Disagree
The project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables.	Strongly AgreeThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Agree	NeutralThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Neutral	DisagreeThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Strongly Disagree
The procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable.	Strongly AgreeThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Agree	NeutralThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Neutral	DisagreeThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Strongly Disagree
Support from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful.	Strongly AgreeSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Strongly Agree	AgreeSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Agree	NeutralSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Neutral	DisagreeSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Strongly Disagree
Risks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way.	Strongly AgreeRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Strongly Agree	AgreeRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Agree	NeutralRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Neutral	DisagreeRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Strongly Disagree
Decision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented.	Strongly AgreeDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Strongly Agree	AgreeDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Agree	NeutralDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Neutral	DisagreeDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

MACRAMÉ Project Meetings

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful.	Strongly AgreeThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Agree	NeutralThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Neutral	DisagreeThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Strongly Disagree
Meeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings.	Strongly AgreeMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Strongly Agree	AgreeMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Agree	NeutralMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Neutral	DisagreeMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Strongly Disagree
The frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate.	Strongly AgreeThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Agree	NeutralThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Neutral	DisagreeThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

The tools used for project management supported my work effectively.

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Collaboration Platform	Strongly AgreeCollaboration Platform Strongly Agree	AgreeCollaboration Platform Agree	NeutralCollaboration Platform Neutral	DisagreeCollaboration Platform Disagree	Strongly DisagreeCollaboration Platform Strongly Disagree
File Exchange	Strongly AgreeFile Exchange Strongly Agree	AgreeFile Exchange Agree	NeutralFile Exchange Neutral	DisagreeFile Exchange Disagree	Strongly DisagreeFile Exchange Strongly Disagree
Co-Authoring platform (Google Drive)	Strongly AgreeCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Strongly Agree	AgreeCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Agree	NeutralCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Neutral	DisagreeCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Disagree	Strongly DisagreeCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Strongly Disagree
Project Management Platform (SyGMa Repro)	Strongly AgreeProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Strongly Agree	AgreeProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Agree	NeutralProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Neutral	DisagreeProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Disagree	Strongly DisagreeProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Strongly Disagree
The permanent ZOOM channel	Strongly AgreeThe permanent ZOOM channel Strongly Agree	AgreeThe permanent ZOOM channel Agree	NeutralThe permanent ZOOM channel Neutral	DisagreeThe permanent ZOOM channel Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe permanent ZOOM channel Strongly Disagree
The Zoom channel booking system	Strongly AgreeThe Zoom channel booking system Strongly Agree	AgreeThe Zoom channel booking system Agree	NeutralThe Zoom channel booking system Neutral	DisagreeThe Zoom channel booking system Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe Zoom channel booking system Strongly Disagree
Templates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use.	Strongly AgreeTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Strongly Agree	AgreeTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Agree	NeutralTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Neutral	DisagreeTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Information flow within MACRAMÉ

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
I felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs.	Strongly AgreeI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Strongly Agree	AgreeI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Agree	NeutralI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Neutral	DisagreeI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Strongly Disagree
The upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well.	Strongly AgreeThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Agree	NeutralThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Neutral	DisagreeThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Strongly Disagree
The information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well.	Strongly AgreeThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Agree	NeutralThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Neutral	DisagreeThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Would you appreciate and use a common email address?

Selected Value: 0

0 = not needed - 5 = absolutely needed

If yes, which type of email address do you prefer?

One for the entire project
One for each Work Package?
Both (one for the entire project and then one per Work Package)

If yes, where would you like to have the list of recipients?

See the full list of recipients in the email system.
Have the list of recipients stored on the project exchange platform.
Not important.

Any additional feedback regarding the Project management?

Is there something you would like to highlight to be improved within any next projects?

External Communication and Project Dissemination

Overall, how satisfied are you with the project’s dissemination?

Selected Value: 0

0 = not satisfied - 5 = absolutely satisfied

Do you think that the Communication & Dissemination Activities increased...

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
...the visibility of yourself.	Strongly Agree...the visibility of yourself. Strongly Agree	Agree...the visibility of yourself. Agree	Neutral...the visibility of yourself. Neutral	Disagree...the visibility of yourself. Disagree	Strongly Disagree...the visibility of yourself. Strongly Disagree
...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute.	Strongly Agree...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Strongly Agree	Agree...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Agree	Neutral...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Neutral	Disagree...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Disagree	Strongly Disagree...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Strongly Disagree
...the visibility of the topic.	Strongly Agree...the visibility of the topic. Strongly Agree	Agree...the visibility of the topic. Agree	Neutral...the visibility of the topic. Neutral	Disagree...the visibility of the topic. Disagree	Strongly Disagree...the visibility of the topic. Strongly Disagree

Tools and materials

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results.	Strongly AgreeThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Agree	NeutralThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Neutral	DisagreeThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Strongly Disagree
The printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach.	Strongly AgreeThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Agree	NeutralThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Neutral	DisagreeThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Strongly Disagree
The templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach.	Strongly AgreeThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Agree	NeutralThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Neutral	DisagreeThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Strongly Disagree
The social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to.	Strongly AgreeThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Agree	NeutralThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Neutral	DisagreeThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Engagement and impact

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
I was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities.	Strongly AgreeI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Strongly Agree	AgreeI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Agree	NeutralI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Neutral	DisagreeI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Strongly Disagree
The project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society).	Strongly AgreeThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Strongly Agree	AgreeThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Agree	NeutralThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Neutral	DisagreeThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Strongly Disagree
The dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ.	Strongly AgreeThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Agree	NeutralThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Neutral	DisagreeThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Which external communication or dissemination activities worked especially well?

MACRAMÉ Events (Webinars, H&S Workshops, Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits)

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear.	Strongly AgreeThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Agree	NeutralThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Neutral	DisagreeThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Strongly Disagree
The online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably.	Strongly AgreeThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Agree	NeutralThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Neutral	DisagreeThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Strongly Disagree
The organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective.	Strongly AgreeThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Agree	NeutralThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Neutral	DisagreeThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Looking back, which specific webinar, workshop or summit was most valuable to you, and why?

Would you change something about the design, content or organisation of the webinars, workshops and summits in future projects?

For future projects, which formats would you prefer to see more often?

Online webinars (i.e. short (1-2 hour) online event for mainly sharing information or training)
Online workshops (i.e. longer (half day or longer) online event with the possibility to have interactions and discussions)
In-person Summits (i.e. events bringing together stakeholders from different fields of expertise)
Hybrid Summits (i.e. events bringing together stakeholders from different fields of expertise with options for online and in-person participation)
Others (please specify)

If you ticked 'other' please specify here:

Any additional feedback regarding the MACRAMÉ dissemination activities?

Based on your experience MACRAMÉ, how likely are you to participate again in a project coordinated by this team?

Selected Value: 0

0 = for sure not - 5 = absolutely yes

MACRAMÉ Project Management, Communication and Dissemination - Satisfaction Survey

Project Management and Internal Communication

I am satisfied with the overall management of the project

Selected Value: 0

0= absolutely unsatisfied - 5= super happy

Planning, monitoring, and support

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Roles and responsibilities were clearly defined.	Strongly AgreeRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Strongly Agree	AgreeRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Agree	NeutralRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Neutral	DisagreeRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Strongly Disagree
The project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables.	Strongly AgreeThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Agree	NeutralThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Neutral	DisagreeThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Strongly Disagree
The procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable.	Strongly AgreeThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Agree	NeutralThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Neutral	DisagreeThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Strongly Disagree
Support from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful.	Strongly AgreeSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Strongly Agree	AgreeSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Agree	NeutralSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Neutral	DisagreeSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Strongly Disagree
Risks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way.	Strongly AgreeRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Strongly Agree	AgreeRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Agree	NeutralRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Neutral	DisagreeRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Strongly Disagree
Decision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented.	Strongly AgreeDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Strongly Agree	AgreeDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Agree	NeutralDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Neutral	DisagreeDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

MACRAMÉ Project Meetings

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful.	Strongly AgreeThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Agree	NeutralThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Neutral	DisagreeThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Strongly Disagree
Meeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings.	Strongly AgreeMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Strongly Agree	AgreeMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Agree	NeutralMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Neutral	DisagreeMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Strongly Disagree
The frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate.	Strongly AgreeThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Agree	NeutralThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Neutral	DisagreeThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

The tools used for project management supported my work effectively.

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Collaboration Platform	Strongly AgreeCollaboration Platform Strongly Agree	AgreeCollaboration Platform Agree	NeutralCollaboration Platform Neutral	DisagreeCollaboration Platform Disagree	Strongly DisagreeCollaboration Platform Strongly Disagree
File Exchange	Strongly AgreeFile Exchange Strongly Agree	AgreeFile Exchange Agree	NeutralFile Exchange Neutral	DisagreeFile Exchange Disagree	Strongly DisagreeFile Exchange Strongly Disagree
Co-Authoring platform (Google Drive)	Strongly AgreeCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Strongly Agree	AgreeCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Agree	NeutralCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Neutral	DisagreeCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Disagree	Strongly DisagreeCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Strongly Disagree
Project Management Platform (SyGMa Repro)	Strongly AgreeProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Strongly Agree	AgreeProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Agree	NeutralProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Neutral	DisagreeProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Disagree	Strongly DisagreeProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Strongly Disagree
The permanent ZOOM channel	Strongly AgreeThe permanent ZOOM channel Strongly Agree	AgreeThe permanent ZOOM channel Agree	NeutralThe permanent ZOOM channel Neutral	DisagreeThe permanent ZOOM channel Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe permanent ZOOM channel Strongly Disagree
The Zoom channel booking system	Strongly AgreeThe Zoom channel booking system Strongly Agree	AgreeThe Zoom channel booking system Agree	NeutralThe Zoom channel booking system Neutral	DisagreeThe Zoom channel booking system Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe Zoom channel booking system Strongly Disagree
Templates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use.	Strongly AgreeTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Strongly Agree	AgreeTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Agree	NeutralTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Neutral	DisagreeTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Information flow within MACRAMÉ

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
I felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs.	Strongly AgreeI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Strongly Agree	AgreeI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Agree	NeutralI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Neutral	DisagreeI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Strongly Disagree
The upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well.	Strongly AgreeThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Agree	NeutralThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Neutral	DisagreeThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Strongly Disagree
The information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well.	Strongly AgreeThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Agree	NeutralThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Neutral	DisagreeThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Would you appreciate and use a common email address?

Selected Value: 0

0 = not needed - 5 = absolutely needed

If yes, which type of email address do you prefer?

One for the entire project
One for each Work Package?
Both (one for the entire project and then one per Work Package)

If yes, where would you like to have the list of recipients?

See the full list of recipients in the email system.
Have the list of recipients stored on the project exchange platform.
Not important.

Any additional feedback regarding the Project management?

Is there something you would like to highlight to be improved within any next projects?

External Communication and Project Dissemination

Overall, how satisfied are you with the project’s dissemination?

Selected Value: 0

0 = not satisfied - 5 = absolutely satisfied

Do you think that the Communication & Dissemination Activities increased...

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
...the visibility of yourself.	Strongly Agree...the visibility of yourself. Strongly Agree	Agree...the visibility of yourself. Agree	Neutral...the visibility of yourself. Neutral	Disagree...the visibility of yourself. Disagree	Strongly Disagree...the visibility of yourself. Strongly Disagree
...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute.	Strongly Agree...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Strongly Agree	Agree...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Agree	Neutral...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Neutral	Disagree...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Disagree	Strongly Disagree...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Strongly Disagree
...the visibility of the topic.	Strongly Agree...the visibility of the topic. Strongly Agree	Agree...the visibility of the topic. Agree	Neutral...the visibility of the topic. Neutral	Disagree...the visibility of the topic. Disagree	Strongly Disagree...the visibility of the topic. Strongly Disagree

Tools and materials

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results.	Strongly AgreeThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Agree	NeutralThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Neutral	DisagreeThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Strongly Disagree
The printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach.	Strongly AgreeThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Agree	NeutralThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Neutral	DisagreeThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Strongly Disagree
The templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach.	Strongly AgreeThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Agree	NeutralThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Neutral	DisagreeThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Strongly Disagree
The social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to.	Strongly AgreeThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Agree	NeutralThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Neutral	DisagreeThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Engagement and impact

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
I was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities.	Strongly AgreeI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Strongly Agree	AgreeI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Agree	NeutralI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Neutral	DisagreeI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Strongly Disagree
The project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society).	Strongly AgreeThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Strongly Agree	AgreeThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Agree	NeutralThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Neutral	DisagreeThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Strongly Disagree
The dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ.	Strongly AgreeThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Agree	NeutralThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Neutral	DisagreeThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Which external communication or dissemination activities worked especially well?

MACRAMÉ Events (Webinars, H&S Workshops, Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits)

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear.	Strongly AgreeThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Agree	NeutralThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Neutral	DisagreeThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Strongly Disagree
The online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably.	Strongly AgreeThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Agree	NeutralThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Neutral	DisagreeThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Strongly Disagree
The organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective.	Strongly AgreeThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Agree	NeutralThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Neutral	DisagreeThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Looking back, which specific webinar, workshop or summit was most valuable to you, and why?

Would you change something about the design, content or organisation of the webinars, workshops and summits in future projects?

For future projects, which formats would you prefer to see more often?

Online webinars (i.e. short (1-2 hour) online event for mainly sharing information or training)
Online workshops (i.e. longer (half day or longer) online event with the possibility to have interactions and discussions)
In-person Summits (i.e. events bringing together stakeholders from different fields of expertise)
Hybrid Summits (i.e. events bringing together stakeholders from different fields of expertise with options for online and in-person participation)
Others (please specify)

If you ticked 'other' please specify here:

Any additional feedback regarding the MACRAMÉ dissemination activities?

Based on your experience MACRAMÉ, how likely are you to participate again in a project coordinated by this team?

Selected Value: 0

0 = for sure not - 5 = absolutely yes

Project Management and Internal Communication

I am satisfied with the overall management of the project

Selected Value: 0

0= absolutely unsatisfied - 5= super happy

Planning, monitoring, and support

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Roles and responsibilities were clearly defined.	Strongly AgreeRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Strongly Agree	AgreeRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Agree	NeutralRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Neutral	DisagreeRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeRoles and responsibilities were clearly defined. Strongly Disagree
The project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables.	Strongly AgreeThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Agree	NeutralThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Neutral	DisagreeThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe project management provided clear guidance on tasks, deadlines and deliverables. Strongly Disagree
The procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable.	Strongly AgreeThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Agree	NeutralThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Neutral	DisagreeThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe procedures for reporting (technical/financial) were clear and manageable. Strongly Disagree
Support from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful.	Strongly AgreeSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Strongly Agree	AgreeSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Agree	NeutralSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Neutral	DisagreeSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeSupport from the coordination team, when questions arose, was timely and helpful. Strongly Disagree
Risks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way.	Strongly AgreeRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Strongly Agree	AgreeRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Agree	NeutralRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Neutral	DisagreeRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeRisks and issues were identified and addressed in a transparent way. Strongly Disagree
Decision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented.	Strongly AgreeDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Strongly Agree	AgreeDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Agree	NeutralDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Neutral	DisagreeDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeDecision‑making processes (e.g. GA/PMC decisions) were transparent and well documented. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

MACRAMÉ Project Meetings

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful.	Strongly AgreeThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Agree	NeutralThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Neutral	DisagreeThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe weekly Wednesday meeting schedule was useful. Strongly Disagree
Meeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings.	Strongly AgreeMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Strongly Agree	AgreeMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Agree	NeutralMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Neutral	DisagreeMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeMeeting agendas and materials were shared in good time before meetings. Strongly Disagree
The frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate.	Strongly AgreeThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Agree	NeutralThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Neutral	DisagreeThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe frequency of project meetings (every 6 months, alternating in person and online) was appropriate. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

The tools used for project management supported my work effectively.

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Collaboration Platform	Strongly AgreeCollaboration Platform Strongly Agree	AgreeCollaboration Platform Agree	NeutralCollaboration Platform Neutral	DisagreeCollaboration Platform Disagree	Strongly DisagreeCollaboration Platform Strongly Disagree
File Exchange	Strongly AgreeFile Exchange Strongly Agree	AgreeFile Exchange Agree	NeutralFile Exchange Neutral	DisagreeFile Exchange Disagree	Strongly DisagreeFile Exchange Strongly Disagree
Co-Authoring platform (Google Drive)	Strongly AgreeCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Strongly Agree	AgreeCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Agree	NeutralCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Neutral	DisagreeCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Disagree	Strongly DisagreeCo-Authoring platform (Google Drive) Strongly Disagree
Project Management Platform (SyGMa Repro)	Strongly AgreeProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Strongly Agree	AgreeProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Agree	NeutralProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Neutral	DisagreeProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Disagree	Strongly DisagreeProject Management Platform (SyGMa Repro) Strongly Disagree
The permanent ZOOM channel	Strongly AgreeThe permanent ZOOM channel Strongly Agree	AgreeThe permanent ZOOM channel Agree	NeutralThe permanent ZOOM channel Neutral	DisagreeThe permanent ZOOM channel Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe permanent ZOOM channel Strongly Disagree
The Zoom channel booking system	Strongly AgreeThe Zoom channel booking system Strongly Agree	AgreeThe Zoom channel booking system Agree	NeutralThe Zoom channel booking system Neutral	DisagreeThe Zoom channel booking system Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe Zoom channel booking system Strongly Disagree
Templates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use.	Strongly AgreeTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Strongly Agree	AgreeTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Agree	NeutralTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Neutral	DisagreeTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeTemplates for deliverables, milestones, reports were clear and easy to use. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Information flow within MACRAMÉ

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
I felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs.	Strongly AgreeI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Strongly Agree	AgreeI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Agree	NeutralI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Neutral	DisagreeI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeI felt well informed about the overall progress of the project and other WPs. Strongly Disagree
The upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well.	Strongly AgreeThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Agree	NeutralThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Neutral	DisagreeThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe upload of abstracts for conferences and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Strongly Disagree
The information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well.	Strongly AgreeThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Agree	NeutralThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Neutral	DisagreeThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe information about upcoming publication and distribution within the Consortium worked well. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Would you appreciate and use a common email address?

Selected Value: 0

0 = not needed - 5 = absolutely needed

If yes, which type of email address do you prefer?

One for the entire project
One for each Work Package?
Both (one for the entire project and then one per Work Package)

If yes, where would you like to have the list of recipients?

See the full list of recipients in the email system.
Have the list of recipients stored on the project exchange platform.
Not important.

Any additional feedback regarding the Project management?

Is there something you would like to highlight to be improved within any next projects?

External Communication and Project Dissemination

Overall, how satisfied are you with the project’s dissemination?

Selected Value: 0

0 = not satisfied - 5 = absolutely satisfied

Do you think that the Communication & Dissemination Activities increased...

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
...the visibility of yourself.	Strongly Agree...the visibility of yourself. Strongly Agree	Agree...the visibility of yourself. Agree	Neutral...the visibility of yourself. Neutral	Disagree...the visibility of yourself. Disagree	Strongly Disagree...the visibility of yourself. Strongly Disagree
...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute.	Strongly Agree...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Strongly Agree	Agree...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Agree	Neutral...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Neutral	Disagree...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Disagree	Strongly Disagree...the visibility of your institution/university/company/institute. Strongly Disagree
...the visibility of the topic.	Strongly Agree...the visibility of the topic. Strongly Agree	Agree...the visibility of the topic. Agree	Neutral...the visibility of the topic. Neutral	Disagree...the visibility of the topic. Disagree	Strongly Disagree...the visibility of the topic. Strongly Disagree

Tools and materials

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results.	Strongly AgreeThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Agree	NeutralThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Neutral	DisagreeThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe project website adequately reflected the project’s activities and results. Strongly Disagree
The printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach.	Strongly AgreeThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Agree	NeutralThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Neutral	DisagreeThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe printed flyers were useful for the Project's outreach. Strongly Disagree
The templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach.	Strongly AgreeThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Agree	NeutralThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Neutral	DisagreeThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe templates (e.g. oral and poster presentations templates) was useful for the Project's outreach. Strongly Disagree
The social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to.	Strongly AgreeThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Agree	NeutralThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Neutral	DisagreeThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe social media activities (e.g. LinkedIn) were used in an appropriate frequency and easy to link/react to. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Engagement and impact

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
I was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities.	Strongly AgreeI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Strongly Agree	AgreeI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Agree	NeutralI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Neutral	DisagreeI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeI was sufficiently involved in planning and implementing dissemination activities. Strongly Disagree
The project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society).	Strongly AgreeThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Strongly Agree	AgreeThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Agree	NeutralThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Neutral	DisagreeThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe project effectively reached relevant stakeholders (e.g. industry, regulators, civil society). Strongly Disagree
The dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ.	Strongly AgreeThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Agree	NeutralThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Neutral	DisagreeThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe dissemination activities were appropriate to the objectives of MACRAMÉ. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Which external communication or dissemination activities worked especially well?

MACRAMÉ Events (Webinars, H&S Workshops, Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits)

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear.	Strongly AgreeThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Agree	NeutralThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Neutral	DisagreeThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe information provided before each event (agenda, objectives, logistics) was clear. Strongly Disagree
The online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably.	Strongly AgreeThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Agree	NeutralThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Neutral	DisagreeThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe online platforms and technical setup for webinars and workshops worked reliably. Strongly Disagree
The organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective.	Strongly AgreeThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Agree	NeutralThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Neutral	DisagreeThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe organisation of the in‑person Regulatory Risk Assessors Summits (venue, logistics, content) was effective. Strongly Disagree

Is there something you would like to add or provide feedback on the question above?

Looking back, which specific webinar, workshop or summit was most valuable to you, and why?

Would you change something about the design, content or organisation of the webinars, workshops and summits in future projects?

For future projects, which formats would you prefer to see more often?

Online webinars (i.e. short (1-2 hour) online event for mainly sharing information or training)
Online workshops (i.e. longer (half day or longer) online event with the possibility to have interactions and discussions)
In-person Summits (i.e. events bringing together stakeholders from different fields of expertise)
Hybrid Summits (i.e. events bringing together stakeholders from different fields of expertise with options for online and in-person participation)
Others (please specify)

If you ticked 'other' please specify here:

Any additional feedback regarding the MACRAMÉ dissemination activities?

Based on your experience MACRAMÉ, how likely are you to participate again in a project coordinated by this team?

Selected Value: 0

0 = for sure not - 5 = absolutely yes